GAMP Services Limited
  • Our Company
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • Services
    • Thermal Validation
    • Commissioning, Qualification & Validation
    • Clean Room Validation
    • Computer System Validation & Data Integrity
    • Bio-Decontamination
  • Manufacturing
    • Data Logger
  • Industries
    • Life Science
    • Pharmaceutical
    • Medical Devices
    • Food & Beverages
    • OEM, Testing & Third-party Validators
    • High-Tech
    • Semiconductor
    • Electrical, Electronics & Mobile
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Automobile, EV, Battery & Renewables
  • Distribution
    • Thermal Validation
    • Cleanroom Monitoring
    • Biodecontamination
    • Tracer Particle Generator
    • Process Analytical Tools (PAT)
  • Resources
    • News
    • Knowledge Centre
  • Investor Relations
    • Governance
    • Board of Directors
    • Key Managerial Personnel (KMP)
    • Composition of Committees
    • Policies
    • Our Group
    • Our Subsidiaries
    • Group Companies
    • Disclosures
    • Annual Report
    • Annual Return
    • Memorandum of Association (MOA)
    • Articles of Association (AOA)
    • Public Offer
    • IPO
    • Offer Documents
Knowledge Centre
Knowledge Centre
  1. Home
  2. Knowledge Centre
  3. Blogs
  4. Purified water system qualification: getting through the three phases
CQV

Purified water system qualification: getting through the three phases

Two to four weeks, then two to four more, then a year. What each phase of a water PQ is really meant to prove.

Praful Patel 6 Aug 2026 3 min read
Purified water system qualification: getting through the three phases
Photo: Crystal Kwok on Unsplash
On this page Where the three phases come from Phase 1: two to four weeks of intensive sampling Phase 2: another two to four weeks Phase 3: one year What to test Pitfalls
Related service Commissioning, Qualification & Validation Learn more

A purified water system is qualified like any other piece of equipment up to the end of OQ. After that it is different. You are no longer proving that a machine works. You are proving that a living system, with biofilm waiting to form on every wetted surface, keeps producing water of the right quality day after day, through maintenance, sanitisation cycles and the change of seasons. That is why water PQ is run in three phases over the better part of a year.

Where the three phases come from

The approach goes back to the FDA's guide to inspections of high purity water systems and is set out in WHO guidance on water for pharmaceutical use. Most regulators expect something close to it. The durations below are the usual ones. Your validation plan should say what you are doing and why.

Phase 1: two to four weeks of intensive sampling

Sample every day at every point of use and at key points in the treatment train: after pretreatment, after reverse osmosis or EDI, the storage tank, the return of the distribution loop. Test chemical and microbiological attributes.

The aim is to show the system produces water of the required quality consistently, and to settle the operating, cleaning, sanitisation and maintenance procedures. Water produced in this phase is not used for manufacturing.

Use phase 1 to learnThis is when you find out which point of use is always the last to recover after sanitisation, and which valve the operators keep leaving with a dead leg. Write it down. It shapes the routine sampling plan.

Phase 2: another two to four weeks

The intensive sampling continues, now with the procedures from phase 1 in force. The point of phase 2 is to show the system stays in control when it is run the way it will be run in routine operation. If phase 1 needed changes to the procedures, phase 2 is where you prove the changes worked.

Phase 3: one year

Once phase 2 is complete, sampling drops to the routine frequency, and the water can be used for manufacturing. Phase 3 runs for a year so that the data covers seasonal effects: feed water quality changes with the monsoon, and higher summer temperatures favour microbial growth in some parts of the system.

At the end of phase 3, the data is reviewed as a whole, and alert and action levels are confirmed or adjusted based on what the system actually does.

What to test

  • Conductivity, measured to the pharmacopoeial method, online where possible.
  • Total organic carbon, with a limit of 500 ppb for purified water and water for injections in the main pharmacopoeias.
  • Microbial count. For purified water, 100 CFU per mL is the commonly used action level. Many sites set tighter alert levels from their own data.
  • Bacterial endotoxins, where the water is water for injections or is used in products where endotoxin matters.
  • Other attributes from your monograph and process needs, such as nitrates or heavy metals for incoming water.

Pitfalls

  • Sampling only from convenient points, rather than the ones furthest from the tank or with the lowest flow.
  • Sampling straight after sanitisation, when counts are at their lowest.
  • Using sampling techniques that differ from how production draws water, such as flushing for a long time before taking the sample.
  • Ending phase 3 without a proper data review, so alert and action levels stay at the values guessed during design.

A water system that has been through all three phases properly is one of the best-understood systems on site. That understanding is worth more than the report.

PP Written by Praful Patel, GAMP Services Limited.
Keep reading

Related articles

View all
Using FAT and SAT results in qualification without repeating every test CQV 18 Sep 20263 min read Using FAT and SAT results in qualification without repeating every test Annex 15 allows it, inspectors accept it, yet many projects still repeat factory tests on site. What it takes to leverage them. Read more Continuous particle monitoring in Grade A after the 2022 Annex 1 Environmental Monitoring 14 Oct 20264 min read Continuous particle monitoring in Grade A after the 2022 Annex 1 Where the probes go, how alarms should be set and what to do with the 5 µm channel now that Annex 1 is in force. Read more Steam sterilizer validation: Bowie-Dick, heat distribution and heat penetration Thermal Validation 9 Oct 20264 min read Steam sterilizer validation: Bowie-Dick, heat distribution and heat penetration What each test on a porous-load autoclave tells you, and the mistakes that send a qualification back for a repeat. Read more

Talk to our team

Talk to us about your next validation or monitoring project.

Contact Us LinkedIn

Our Business

  • Services
  • Manufacturing
  • Distribution
  • Industries

Services

  • Thermal Validation
  • Commissioning, Qualification & Validation
  • Clean Room Validation
  • Computer System Validation & Data Integrity
  • Bio-Decontamination

Company

  • About Us
  • Investor Relations
  • News
  • Knowledge Centre
  • Contact Us
copyrightGAMP Services Limited 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy Terms of Use